Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 7 , Pages 1198-1203, July 2009

Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery

From the Department of Ophthalmology (Tang, Hoffer, Olson, Miller), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and the Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Ophthalmology (Tang), Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Received 28 July 2008; received in revised form 18 February 2009; accepted 22 February 2009.

Purpose

To determine the accuracy of Pentacam Scheimpflug system Holladay equivalent keratometry (K) readings (EKRs) in calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power after corneal refractive surgery, including laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and radial keratotomy (RK).

Setting

Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Methods

In this combined retrospective and prospective clinical study, patients who had cataract surgery after corneal refractive surgery were recalled to have Scheimpflug imaging of the operated cornea and Holladay EKR determination. The Holladay EKR was compared with a gold-standard K value, which was the back-calculated value using the original Hoffer formula based on the actual surgical outcomes. Eyes without a history of refractive surgery served as controls.

Results

Twenty-seven patients (41 eyes) were evaluated; 26 eyes had previous LASIK or PRK and 15, previous RK. Forty-one eyes served as controls. The mean error of the Holladay EKR in eyes with previous LASIK or PRK was +1.84 diopters (D) (range +0.66 to +4.94 D). The mean error in eyes with previous RK was +2.17 D (range +0.48 to +3.09 D). In the control eyes, the mean EKR error was +1.38 D (range −0.17 to +2.54 D).

Conclusions

The Holladay EKR calculated using version 1.16r04 of the Scheimpflug system software was inaccurate in virgin corneas and in those with a history of LASIK, PRK, or RK using current IOL power calculation formulas. The Scheimpflug power measurements were consistently steeper than the true corneal power.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

 Presented in part at the ASCRS Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA, April 2008.

 Supported by unrestricted gifts from John A. Lyddon and the Carl and Roberta Deutsch Foundation.

PII: S0886-3350(09)00367-8

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.02.030

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 7 , Pages 1198-1203, July 2009