Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 7 , Pages 1193-1197, July 2009

Accuracy of Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation

From the G.B. Bietti Eye Foundation-IRCCS (Savini), Rome, and Studio Oculistico d'Azeglio (Barboni, Carbonelli), Bologna, Italy; Jules Stein Eye Institute (Hoffer), University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Received 9 January 2009; received in revised form 16 February 2009; accepted 17 February 2009.

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy of corneal power measurements by the Pentacam Scheimpflug system for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.

Setting

Studio Oculistico d'Azeglio, Bologna, Italy.

Methods

Consecutive patients having phacoemulsification and in-the-bag IOL implantation were prospectively studied. Intraocular lens power was calculated by entering 3 combinations of data into the Hoffer Q formula: (1) corneal power measurements by corneal topography (simulated keratometry) and axial length (AL) measurements by Ultrascan ultrasound (US) immersion biometry; (2) Scheimpflug corneal power measurements (simulated keratometry) and US AL measurements; (3) corneal power and AL measurements by partial coherence interferometry (PCI) (IOLMaster). The prediction error was calculated as the difference between the predicted and the measured refraction 1 month postoperatively.

Results

Forty-one eyes were evaluated. The mean arithmetic error was zero for all combinations of measurements due to constant optimization. The mean absolute error (MAE) of the Scheimpflug–US combination was good (0.44 diopters [D] ± 0.30 [SD]) but significantly higher than the topography–US combination and PCI (0.33 ± 0.29 D and 0.33 ± 0.23 D, respectively) (P = .043). The percentage of eyes with an MAE of 0.75 D or greater was higher with the Scheimpflug–US combination (7 eyes, 17%) than with the corneal topography–US combination (2 eyes, 4.8%) or PCI (3 eyes, 7.3%).

Conclusion

Corneal power measurements with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system should be used in IOL power calculation formulas with caution because the accuracy is good but is not as high as with standard measurement methods.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr. Hoffer is the author of the Hoffer Q formula and owns The EyeLab, which sells the Hoffer Programs database. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(09)00369-1

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.02.031

Refers to erratum:

  • Errata

    Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery August 2009 (Vol. 35, Issue 8, Page 1483)

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 7 , Pages 1193-1197, July 2009