Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 8 , Pages 1401-1409 , August 2009

Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction

Received 11 May 2008 ,Revised 12 March 2009 ,Accepted 19 March 2009.

References 

  1. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980;57:378–387
  2. Mansfield JS, Ahn SJ, Legge GE, Luebker A. A new reading-acuity chart for normal and low vision. In: Ophthalmic & Visual Optics/Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System. Technical Digest. 3:Washington DC: Optical Society of America; 1993;p. 232–235
  3. Massof RW, Ahmadian L, Grover LL, Deremeik JT, Goldstein JE, Rainey C, et al. The activity inventory: an adaptive visual function questionnaire. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:763–774
  4. Sheedy JE, Subbaram MV, Zimmerman AB, Hayes JR. Text legibility and the letter superiority effect. Hum Factors. 2005;47:797–815
  5. Liu L, Arditi A. How crowding affects letter confusion. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:50–55
  6. Wolffsohn JS, Cochrane AL. The practical near acuity chart (PNAC) and prediction of visual ability at near. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000;20:90–97
  7. Williams MA, Moutray TN, Jackson AJ. Uniformity of visual acuity measures in published studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4321–4327
  8. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1976;53:740–745
  9. Alió JL, Tavolato M, De la Hoz F, Claramonte P, Rodríguez-Prats J-L, Galal A. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses; comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2494–2503
  10. Claoué C. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation; prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2088–2091
  11. Pineda-Fernández A, Jaramillo J, Celis V, Vargas J, DiStacio M, Galíndez A, et al. Refractive outcomes after bilateral multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:685–688
  12. Alió JL, Mulet ME. Presbyopia correction with an anterior chamber phakic multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1368–1374
  13. Schmidinger G, Simader C, Dejaco-Ruhswurm I, Skorpik C, Pieh S. Contrast sensitivity function in eyes with diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:2076–2083
  14. Tsorbatzoglou A, Németh G, Máth J, Berta A. Pseudophakic accommodation and pseudoaccommodation under physiological conditions measured with partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1345–1350
  15. Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES, Chalita MR, Oliveira F, Freitas LL, et al. Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:827–832
  16. Chiam PJT, Chan JH, Aggarwal RK, Kasaby S. ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: quality of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1459–1463errata, 1987
  17. Hütz WW, Eckhardt HB, Röhrig B, Grolmus R. Reading ability with 3 multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:2015–2021
  18. Vingolo EM, Grenga P, Iacobelli L, Grenga R. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1244–1247
  19. Toto L, Falconio G, Vecchiarino L, Scorcia V, Di Nicola M, Ballone E, et al. Visual performance and biocompatibility of 2 multifocal diffractive IOLs; six-month comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1419–1425
  20. Mester U, Hunold W, Wesendahl T, Kaymak H. Functional outcomes after implantation of Tecnis ZM900 and Array SA40 multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1033–1040
  21. Pepose JS, Qazi MA, Davies J, Doane JF, Loden JC, Sivalingham V, et al. Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:347–357
  22. Küchle M, Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, Gusek-Schneider GC, Seitz B, Hanna KD. Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:208–216
  23. Dogru M, Honda R, Omoto M, Toda I, Fujishima H, Arai H, et al. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:895–902
  24. Heatley CJ, Spalton DJ, Hancox J, Kumar A, Marshall J. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:207–213
  25. Vargas LG, Auffarth GU, Becker KA, Rabsilber TM, Holzer MP. Performance of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens in relation to capsulorhexis size. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:363–368
  26. Koeppl C, Findl O, Menapace R, Kriechbaum K, Wirtitsch M, Buehl W, et al. Pilocarpine-induced shift of an accommodating intraocular lens: AT-45 Crystalens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1290–1297
  27. Cumming JS, Colvard DM, Dell SJ, Doane J, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, et al. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens; results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:812–825
  28. Schneider H, Stachs O, Göbel K, Guthoff R. Changes of the accommodative amplitude and the anterior chamber depth after implantation of an accommodative intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:322–329
  29. Hancox J, Spalton D, Heatley C, Jayaram H, Marshall J. Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1098–1103
  30. Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA, Motwani NK, Shah S, Hunt OA, Mantry S, et al. Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 “accommodative” intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:693–696
  31. Macsai MS, Padnick-Silver L, Fontes BM. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:628–633
  32. McLeod SD. Optical principles, biomechanics, and initial clinical performance of a dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Available at Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2006;104:437–452http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1809902&blobtype=pdfAccessed April 23, 2009
  33. Ossma IL, Galvis A, Vargas LG, Trager MJ, Vagefi MR, McLeod SD. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:47–52
  34. Marchini G, Mora P, Pedrotti E, Manzotti F, Aldigeri R, Gandolfi SA. Functional assessment of two different accommodative intraocular lenses compared with a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:2038–2043
  35. Sanders DR, Sanders ML. Visual performance results after Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1679–1684
  36. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310
  37. Lovie-Kitchin JE, Brown B. Repeatability and intercorrelations of standard vision tests as a function of age. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:412–420
  38. Siderov J, Tiu AL. Variability of measurements of visual acuity in a large eye clinic. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77:673–676
  39. Just MA, Carpenter PA. A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychol Rev. 1980;87:329–354
  40. Arditi A, Cho J. Letter case and text legibility in normal and low vision. Vision Res. 2007;47:2499–2505

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

 Presented in part at the annual conference of the British Society for Refractive Surgery, Oxford, United Kingdom, July 2006, and the XXIV Congress of the European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons, London, United Kingdom, September 2006.

PII: S0886-3350(09)00412-X

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.026

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 8 , Pages 1401-1409 , August 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution