Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 10 , Pages 1734-1738, October 2009

Intraocular lens power requirements for humanitarian missions

From the Ophthalmology Departments, Naval Medical Center San Diego (Lombard, McClatchey), San Diego, California, and Naval Hospital Newport (Borges), Newport, Rhode Island; Loma Linda University Medical Center (McClatchey), Loma Linda, California; Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences (McClatchey), Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Received 12 March 2009; received in revised form 30 April 2009; accepted 5 May 2009.

Purpose

To develop a generalized method to determine an optimum set of intraocular lens (IOL) powers for humanitarian missions.

Setting

Humanitarian missions to Central America, South America, and Southeast Asia.

Methods

Biometric data of adults who had cataract surgery on 2 humanitarian missions were reviewed, and the ideal emmetropic IOL power for each eye was calculated. Using statistical modeling, the number of extra IOLs required at each power to account for natural variation inherent in random population samples was calculated. To limit the total number of IOLs and maximize availability of suitable IOLs for each patient, a tolerance strategy for choosing IOL powers was developed and the ideal proportion of extra IOLs required at each power was empirically determined.

Results

Data of 103 patients were reviewed. The mean IOL power was 20.38 diopters (D) ± 2.32 (SD). Applying a tolerance strategy to accept IOLs with powers 0.5 D below or 1.0 D above the emmetropic IOL power, the number of extra IOLs required at each power was decreased to a fraction of the fourth root of the number of eyes anticipated to require that IOL power. The model predicted that with this strategy, fewer than 2% of all patients would be rejected due to lack of an IOL with a suitable power.

Conclusions

The spreadsheet-based IOL power prediction model calculated an ideal distribution of IOLs to order for humanitarian cataract surgery. It is generalizable to missions of any size and should help planners minimize costs while ensuring excellent refractive outcomes.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

 Presented at the ASCRS Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, San Francisco, California, USA, April 2009.

 Prepared as part of Dr. Lombard's official duties. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.

 Electronic copies of the spreadsheet used in the study are available from the corresponding author.

PII: S0886-3350(09)00659-2

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.029

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 10 , Pages 1734-1738, October 2009