Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 230-234 , February 2010

Intraocular lens power calculation: Clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devices

Presented at the XXVI Congress of the European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons, Berlin, Germany, September 2008, and the ASCRS Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, San Francisco, California, USA, April 2009.

Received 10 June 2009 ,Revised 28 August 2009 ,Accepted 9 September 2009.

References 

  1. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, Musgrove KH, Lewis JW, Ruiz RS. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14:17–24
  2. Sanders DR, Retzlaff JA, Kraff MC, Gimbel HV, Raanan MG. Comparison of the SRK/T formula and other theoretical and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16:341–346
  3. Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19:700–712errata, 1994; 20:677
  4. Hoffer KJ. Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1233–1237
  5. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:472–485Available at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/118515642/PDFSTARTAccessed October 30, 2009
  6. Lee AC, Qazi MA, Pepose JS. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19:13–17
  7. Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:765–773
  8. Holladay JT. Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:1356–1370Available at: http://www.docholladay.com/publications/StandardizingConstants.pdfAccessed October 30, 2009
  9. Basu S. Comparison of IOL power calculations by the IOLMaster vs theoretical calculations. Eye. 2006;20:90–97
  10. Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R, Rainer G, Vass C, Hitzenberger CK, et al. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126:524–534
  11. Haigis W. Optical coherence biometry. Dev Ophthalmol. 2002;34:119–130
  12. Holzer MP, Mamusa M, Auffarth GU. Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyzer for biometric measurements. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:807–810
  13. Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Berrow EJ. A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:949–953
  14. Krummenauer F. II: Differenzenplots oder Punktewoken – wann was anwenden?[II: Difference plots or scattergram – when to use which?]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2002;219:682–685
  15. Riederle F, Buchwald H-J, Preissinger C, Lang GK. Refraktive Gesichtspunkte moderner Katarakt-Chirurgie [Refractive aspects of modern cataract surgery]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2006;223:943–951
  16. McEwan JR, Massengill RK, Friedel SD. Effect of keratometer and axial length measurement errors on primary implant power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16:61–70
  17. Eleftheriadis H. IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:960–963Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1771781/pdf/bjo08700960.pdfAccessed October 30, 2009
  18. Kielhorn I, Rajan MS, Tesha PM, Subryan VR, Bell JA. Clinical assessment of the Zeiss IOLMaster. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:518–522
  19. Wang J-K, Hu C-Y, Chang S-W. Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:262–267
  20. MacLaren RE, Natkunarajah M, Riaz Y, Bourne RRA, Restori M, Allan BDS. Biometry and formula accuracy with intraocular lenses used for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:920–931
  21. Lege BAM, Haigis W. Laser interference biometry versus ultrasound biometry in certain clinical conditions. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:8–12

 Supported by a research grant from Haag-Streit AG, Köniz, Switzerland.

PII: S0886-3350(09)00999-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.09.016

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 230-234 , February 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution