Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 389-395, March 2010

Color discrimination by patients with different types of light-filtering intraocular lenses

From Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University Eye Center, Beijing, China

Received 19 June 2009; received in revised form 15 August 2009; accepted 22 September 2009.

Purpose

To evaluate photopic and mesopic color discrimination in patients with different types of light-filtering intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Setting

Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University Eye Center, Beijing, China.

Methods

Cataract patients with different types of IOLs were enrolled 3 months postoperatively. Overall and partial color discrimination under photopic (1000 lux) and mesopic (40 lux) conditions were evaluated with the Farnsworth-Munsell (FM) 100-hue test. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was tested under both conditions. Subjective visual quality was assessed with the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25).

Results

The study evaluated 43 patients with a blue light–filtering IOL (15 photochromic, 13 yellow tinted) or an IOL filtering ultraviolet light only (n = 15). The difference in the FM 100-hue total error scores under photopic or mesopic conditions was not statistically significant between groups. There were no statistically significant differences in partial error scores in the 10 bands of the FM 100-hue color circle under photopic conditions. Under mesopic condition, there were statistically significant differences in partial error scores in the green to blue–green band (color caps 36 to 46) and the blue–green to blue band (color caps 46 to 54) (P = .005 and P = .030, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in mean overall or subheading NEI VFQ-25 scores.

Conclusions

Filtering blue lights under mesopic conditions seemed to modify color discrimination in the green-to-blue bands postoperatively. The modification did not disturb overall color discrimination or cause subjective discomfort.

Financial Disclosure

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 30672284.

PII: S0886-3350(09)01137-7

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.09.038

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 389-395, March 2010