Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 380-388 , March 2010

Functional assessment of accommodating intraocular lenses versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: Metaanalysis

Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, May 2009.

Received 18 February 2009 ,Revised 29 September 2009 ,Accepted 30 September 2009.

References 

  1. Glasser A. Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia. Clin Exp Optom. 2008;91:279–295
  2. Glasser A. Restoration of accommodation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:12–18
  3. Nishi Y, Mireskandari K, Khaw P, Findl O. Lens refilling to restore accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:374–382
  4. Findl O, Leydolt C. Meta-analysis of accommodating intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:522–527
  5. Cumming JS, Colvard DM, Dell SJ, Doane J, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, et al. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:812–825
  6. van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group; the Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine. 2003;28(12):1290–1299
  7. Kriechbaum K, Findl O, Koeppl C, Menapace R, Drexler W. Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:453–459
  8. Beiko G. Status of accommodative intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18:74–79
  9. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Assessment of study quality. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]; Section 6. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  10. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias; dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408–412
  11. Wang C-Y, Ma B, Wang L-L. [Clinical accommodative status study of the accommodative foldable intraocular lens]. (Chinese) Guoji Yanke Zazhi. 2005;5:669–671
  12. Xu M, Li WS, Zhao YE, Wang QM. [The clinical efficacy of accommodative intraocular lens and multifocal intraocular lens in pseudophakic after phacoemulsification]. (Chinese) Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2007;43(2):104–107
  13. Legeais JM, Werner L, Abenhaim A, Renard G. Pseudoaccommodation: BioComFold versus a foldable silicone intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:262–267
  14. Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Nubile M, Falconio G, Ballone E. Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1307–1312
  15. Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Menapace R, Koeppl C, Sacu S, Wirtitsch M, et al. Laserinterferometric assessment of pilocarpine-induced movement of an accommodating intraocular lens; a randomized trial. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1515–1521
  16. Heatley CJ, Spalton DJ, Hancox J, Kumar A, Marshall J. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:207–213
  17. Sauder G, Degenring RF, Kamppeter B, Hugger P. Potential of the 1 CU accommodative intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1289–1292Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1772858/pdf/bjo08901289.pdfAccessed November 16, 2009
  18. Kamppeter BA, Sauder G, Jonas JB. Contrast and glare sensitivity after implantation of AcrySof and Human Optics 1CU intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005;15:458–461
  19. Dogru M, Honda R, Omoto M, Toda I, Fujishima H, Arai H, et al. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:895–902
  20. Hancox J, Spalton D, Heatley C, Jayaram H, Marshall J. Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1098–1103
  21. Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA, Motwani NK, Shah S, Hunt OA, Mantry S, et al. Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 “accommodative” intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:693–696Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1860198/pdf/693.pdfAccessed November 16, 2009
  22. Marchini G, Mora P, Pedrotti E, Manzotti F, Aldigeri R, Gandolfi SA. Functional assessment of two different accommodative intraocular lenses compared with a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:2038–2043
  23. Hancox J, Spalton D, Heatley C, Jayaram H, Yip J, Boyce J, et al. Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:413–417
  24. Harman FE, Maling S, Kampougeris G, Langan L, Khan I, Lee N, et al. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses; a randomized trial. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:993–1001
  25. Buehl W, Findl O. Effect of intraocular lens design on posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1976–1985
  26. Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Pande MV, Hollick EJ, Barman S, Boyce J, et al. Relationship between intraocular lens biomaterials and posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:352–360
  27. Auffarth GU, Brezin A, Caporossi A, Lafuma A, Mendicute J, Berdeaux G, et al. Comparison of Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates following phacoemulsification with implantation of PMMA, silicone, or acrylic intra-ocular lenses in four European countries; European PCO Study Group. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2004;11:319–329
  28. Pepin SM. Neuroadaptation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19:10–12
  29. Leydolt C, Neumayer T, Prinz A, Findl O. Effect of patient motivation on near vision in pseudophakic patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:398–405

PII: S0886-3350(09)01174-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.09.039

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 380-388 , March 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution