Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 9 , Pages 1474-1478, September 2010

Precision of biometry, keratometry, and refractive measurements with a partial coherence interferometry–keratometry device

  • H. John Shammas, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: H. John Shammas, MD, 3510 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Lynwood, California 90262, USA.
  • ,
  • Steven Chan

From the Department of Ophthalmology (Shammas), Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, and a private practice (Shammas, Chan), Lynwood, California, USA

Received 16 December 2009; received in revised form 19 February 2010; accepted 23 February 2010.

Purpose

To evaluate the precision of the axial length (AL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), astigmatism, and minus astigmatic cylinder axis measurements by a partial coherence interferometry (PCI)–keratometry device.

Setting

Private practice, Lynwood, California.

Methods

This prospective comparative observational study analyzed measurements in the second eye to have cataract surgery. Before surgery in the first eye, AL, K, ACD, astigmatism, and cylinder axis in both eyes were measured with an IOLMaster PCI device. The measurements were repeated approximately 1 month later, before second eye-surgery. The 2 sets of measurements were compared.

Results

The study evaluated 121 eyes of 121 patients. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for AL was 0.999 in all 3 signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) categories; the highest difference range was with an SNR below 100. Astigmatism, K, and cylinder axis had a high correlation in flat corneas (K reading <42.0 diopters [D]) (ICC = 0.994, 0.978, and 0.918, respectively) and a poorer correlation with K readings between 42.0 D and 44.0 D (ICC = 0.905, 0.774, and 0.456, respectively) and K readings above 44.0 D (ICC = 0.988, 0.729 and 0.446, respectively).

Conclusions

The precision of the PCI measurements was extremely high for AL with low fluctuations (95% limits of agreement [LoA], 0.06 mm) and was relatively high for K readings with higher fluctuations (95% LoA, 0.55 D) and for ACD (95% LoA, 0.2 mm). The precision of astigmatism and cylinder axis was high in flat corneas and relatively low in steeper corneas.

Financial Disclosure

Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0886-3350(10)00848-5

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.02.027

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 9 , Pages 1474-1478, September 2010