Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 9 , Pages 1503-1507, September 2010

Transconjunctival single-plane sclerocorneal incisions versus clear corneal incisions in cataract surgery

  • Shigeru Sugai, MD
  • ,
  • Fumiaki Yoshitomi, MD
  • ,
  • Tetsuro Oshika, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tetsuro Oshika, MD, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575 Japan.

From Sugai Eye Clinic (Sugai) and Dazaifu Yoshitomi Eye Center (Yoshitomi), Fukuoka, and the Department of Ophthalmology (Oshika), Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

Received 31 December 2009; received in revised form 5 February 2010; accepted 10 March 2010.

Purpose

To compare a transconjunctival single-plane sclerocorneal incision with 2 tiny conjunctival cuts at both ends and a clear corneal incision (CCI) in cataract surgery.

Setting

Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Methods

Patients having routine cataract surgery were randomly divided into 2 groups based on incision type; that is, transconjunctival single-plane sclerocorneal or CCI. The incidence of intraoperative ballooning of the conjunctiva (chemosis) and the percentage of eyes that required stromal hydration to securely close the wound in each group were recorded and compared.

Results

Each group comprised 61 eyes (61 patients). No eye in the transconjunctival sclerocorneal group and 6 eyes (9.8%) in the CCI group developed intraoperative conjunctival chemosis (P = .027, Fisher exact probability test). Corneal stromal hydration was required in 2 eyes (3.3%) and 15 eyes (24.6%), respectively (P = .001).

Conclusion

The transconjunctival single-plane sclerocorneal incision was effective and combined the merits of CCI incisions and sclerocorneal incisions.

Financial Disclosure

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0886-3350(10)00858-8

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.03.045

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 9 , Pages 1503-1507, September 2010