Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 9 , Pages 1499-1502, September 2010

Aqueous penetration of moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution and besifloxacin 0.6% ophthalmic suspension in cataract surgery patients

From the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Received 6 February 2010; received in revised form 2 April 2010; accepted 2 April 2010.

Purpose

To determine the aqueous humor concentrations of moxifloxacin and besifloxacin after routine preoperative topical dosing in patients having cataract surgery.

Setting

Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Methods

In this prospective randomized parallel double-masked clinical trial, 1 drop of commercially available moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution or besifloxacin 0.6% ophthalmic suspension was administered every 10 minutes for a total of 4 doses beginning 1 hour before routine cataract surgery. Aqueous humor was sampled via the paracentesis, and antibiotic concentrations were determined using validated high-performance liquid chromatography procedures.

Results

The study enrolled 50 patients. The aqueous concentration of the antibiotic agent was detectable in all 23 moxifloxacin samples and in 10 (40%) of the 25 besifloxacin samples (P<.0001, Pearson chi-square test). The mean aqueous concentration in the moxifloxacin samples was 50-fold higher than in the besifloxacin samples (1.6108 μg/mL versus 0.0319 μg/mL) when all samples were included (P<.0001, Wilcoxon test), while the moxifloxacin concentration was 38-fold higher than the besifloxacin concentration (1.6108 μg/mL versus 0.0422 μg/mL) in the samples with detectable antibiotic agent (P<.0001).

Conclusions

After topical preoperative administration, moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution had a 38-fold to 50-fold higher concentration in the aqueous humor than besifloxacin 0.6% ophthalmic suspension. Besifloxacin was undetectable in more than half the aqueous humor samples.

Financial Disclosure

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part from an unrestricted research grant from Alcon Laboratories to Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore.

 Christina Ohnsman, MD, provided editorial assistance.

PII: S0886-3350(10)00859-X

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.04.030

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 9 , Pages 1499-1502, September 2010